OCTOBER 2006


Examining the highest ranked advisory firms— what separates the best from the rest?

Part 2 of 2

Last month, we explored how we at AdvisorBenchmarking identify the top advisory firms— namely by the size of the firm, growth rate, profitability and range of services. In the second part of our best practices exposé, we continue our examination of the best advisory practices to identify what really differentiates top performers from average firms. We looked at a number of statistics that showed a marked difference between the best and the rest. Our results identified the three largest differentiators that separate leading practices from the rest of the pack: clients per employee, employee compensation and services offered.

Key Strategy #1: Giving your clients a high touch experience

Our research shows that today’s best firms appear to have the ability to attract more profitable clients and give them more personal attention. In the 1990s, when client portfolios were climbing 12% to 15% a year, advisors didn’t have to add a lot of new clients to achieve profit growth. This environment has changed dramatically in the last few years. During the 2000-2002 bear market, firms of all sizes were awash with new prospective clients. But those firms with greater staff support proved much more adept at replacing their lower-asset clients with larger more profitable ones. Ultimately, these clients generated higher profits, allowing the larger firms to reinvest, add capacity and continue to grow. Having a lower ratio of clients to employees also ensures that each client is getting a high-touch experience, which leads to better client retention.

Key Strategy #2: Take care of your greatest asset

One of the most expensive line items in your budget is probably your staff, so it’s important to get the most out of this very valuable resource. Not only should you invest in them, you should strive to have the highest quality staff members on board to support your business. Our research reveals that the best firms allocate more of their budget to staff (35% vs. 22%), and that the best firms spend more on each employee—more than twice what average firms pay—$49,000 vs. $22,000. Note that those expenses are associated with just employees—principal compensation and benefits are not included. (The average number of employees for the average firm is nine versus 13 for the top firms.) Employing superior employees and compensating them fairly keeps employees happy and improves retention rates, which eliminates the headaches and time associated with finding new staff members.

Key Strategy #3: Offering the right services

Here’s a real-life example of when less is more. According to our research, top performing advisory firms actually tend to offer a more narrow range of services—and it might surprise you to learn that this translates into a more profitable business. Most of the best firms offer six or fewer services to their clients. Understanding that a broader range of services doesn’t necessarily translate into more profits may also provide a revealing look at today’s investment clients. The savvy investor may not be looking for a “jack of all trades” advisory firm. Instead, by offering an exceptionally wide band of services, a firm could be signaling that it doesn’t have an area of specialty or expertise. That’s not to say that providing multiple products and services isn’t an important part of a successful wealth management business model, but there’s also something to be said about firms that have their fingers in too many pies. Evaluate your existing service offerings and decide how much value these services bring to your clients. How good are you at offering them? How do they impact your profitability?

Takeaways

Top firms share many key characteristics that inarguably contribute to their success. Notable among those, top firms strive to offer clients a higher touch experience, invest in their employees and provide their clients the highest level of quality possible within a limited but specialized product offering.
Maya Ivanova is a research analyst with Rydex AdvisorBenchmarking.com, an affiliate of Rydex Investments. She can be reached at mivanova@advisorbenchmarking.com.

Information provided by the Rydex PracticeValue program is based on data obtained from advisor responses to AdvisorBenchmarking.com surveys and does not constitute consulting advice. Advisors should ultimately rely on their own judgment in making business decisions related to their financial practices. AdvisorBenchmarking.com and the Rydex PracticeValue program are services of Advisor Research Center, Inc., an affiliate of Rydex Investments. Advisor Research Center, Inc., and its affiliates make no warranties, expressed or implied, as to results to be obtained from the use of information provided by the Rydex PracticeValue program and/or AdvisorBenchmarking.com, and Advisor Research Center, Inc., expressly disclaims all warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose of use with respect thereto. While Advisor Research Center, Inc., believes the information to be reliable, Advisor Research Center, Inc., and its affiliates shall not be liable for any claims or losses of any nature in connection with the information contained in this publication.